Leadership in Practice
Leadership – the foundations.
Back to basics . . .
Just for a moment, may I ask you to consider what you believe to be the very first step in establishing a leadership relationship with another or other persons?
If you reflect on the definition of leadership I’ve been promoting over past discussions – focusing the desire for change that’s resident in others and then facilitating the creation of a sustainable new reality - you’ll likely say that it has something to do with desire or vision. In turn, I’d suggest that this is far from being the first step.
“Well then”, you say, “it must be related to community of purpose, shared interests and common purpose”. Again, while these are early considerations, I think not. There must be something even more fundamental, without which there is no connection or even mutual awareness. What might that be, exactly?
Such awareness could be described as a relationship but this might be a grandiose term for something which could be primitive to say the least. Also, as we recognize from general experience, whenever people are brought together or made aware of one another in an artificial or contrived manner - as can happen with an imposed appointment - formal relationships and real relationships tend to be worlds apart; they’re not nearly the same thing.
For the sake of convenience, I’m going to suggest that we consider this basic awareness as an “attachment”. We could then explore it from the stage of emerging awareness, as in a newborn child’s first observable response to its mother, right through to deep, multifaceted complexity, as will occur in mother-child bonding and which can last beyond a lifetime.
My position is that leaders need some form of attachment in order to be effective. Allow me to share a brief story that will shed some light on this idea.
Panic in the Pub . . .
It began like any other Friday evening with small groups of people gathering at a local watering hole for a few beers to celebrate the end of yet another work week. The many small and diverse pockets of people with common interests relaxed as the evening progressed and people began interacting with those in neighbouring groups facilitated by diminishing inhibitions, all encouraged by ‘demon alcohol’.
Suddenly, there was a piercing scream carrying a clear note of panic. It came from a group at a random grouping of tables close by the main entrance. There was immediate confusion and intense yet unfocused activity which did very little to clarify the precise nature of the situation.
Then the word “Fire” emerged from the gathering panic. A young lady’s clothing was burning and her neighbours were trying to smother the flames as well as escape the danger. Tables were being displaced and chairs overturned in the resultant melee. Everything was compounded by persons at adjacent tables trying desperately to squeeze past the confused area in their attempts to get to safety.
There were other well-meaning individuals, further from the scene, trying to help by organizing an orderly evacuation of the premises but many others just sat passively and stared, apparently paralyzed by events and seemingly unable or unwilling to move themselves. As the seconds passed, the confused action escalated and began to spin out of control.
Suddenly, above the confusion, there was a stentorian shout, “Peter, Bill, Stephie . . .”. It was like a knife had cut through the confusion and a small oasis of relative quiet emerged as the three individuals identified their names above the noise and turned to the speaker. “Use the beers on the table and then get her behind the bar, now!” the voice directed.
At once there was deliberate action in the directed manner and, visibly, the panic began to subside. Within a few more seconds there was a sense of relief and restored order as the intense action was markedly reduced and the danger was brought under control. Those who were seated some distance away also relaxed even though they were still unsure what all the fuss had been about.
In a few more minutes a select group of people were competently containing the situation and arranging needed help for the unfortunate young lady. The danger was well and truly past.
Leadership in action . . .
What happened here?
In any panic situation there’s confusion. Despite our best intentions we will assert our own interests, sometimes at the expense of others. Leadership is needed but it seems that only a few can rise to the occasion effectively.
Asserting leadership and control though is not as easy as it seems. In the situation above, there were several persons attempting to take charge and to contain the panic. None were able to do so until our ‘hero’ resolved the situation through the actions of Peter, Bill and Stephie. That was the key – the use of these individual’s names!
We all recognize our names, even in a crowd, although we could be otherwise focused or distracted, and even under stress. Our names are an essential channel to our consciousness, a triggering device that alerts us to refocus and to respond. This is also the first step in creating attachment, so much more than any attention-grabbing ploy. Consider the difference in our response if we were to be signalled by some other means, such as “Hey You!”
So leaders need to establish and build attachments, especially with those who they would lead. We’re all well able to do this as individuals but the process may not always be obvious. Let’s review it by using a model developed by the well-known clinical & development psychologist, Gordon Neufeld, PhD.
He proposes a two-phase model, rather like the structure of a plant – roots below the ground and stem above. His work on attachment is centered mainly on child development but I believe it has great applications for adult relationships too
Developing attachment . . .
If you consider the diagram below you’ll note that the attachment part relates mainly to the root structure. It begins with the root bole which is located immediately beneath the surface and symbolises the Senses. Our physical senses of sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing are the portal through which we become aware of others. The impression is superficial and low risk for the most part.

Going deeper, there are two emerging channels of Sameness and also Belonging & Loyalty. In this way we identify with others through common features, e.g. values, needs, interests and circumstances, and this increases our affiliation and, at the same time, our feelings of vulnerability. Having a tie, such as a kin relationship, shared membership or unifying purpose will achieve the same outcome and perhaps more profoundly.
Deeper attachments are formed, according to Dr. Neufeld, as we discover Significance between us through meaningful commitments and vested interests, and these can become emotional entities such as a state of mutual Love. The ultimate level of attachment arises when there’s intimate, trust-based knowledge of one another (Being Known). As attachment deepens, vulnerabilities increase.
Above the ground there’s the stem which represents those behaviours which emanate from attachment. In brief terms these are adaptive, emergent and integrative in form, serving to stimulate needed changes to grow and develop within a given context and to strengthen and reinforce the relationship; but more on this later.
Making it work . . .
How can attachment help a leader or manager be more effective?
Firstly we need to recognize that any effective relationship has to be built on a firm base of attachment – bonds will open up the channels through which influences can be exchanged. This was demonstrated in the Pub story. The initial step is to Sense (recognize/acknowledge) the presence of others as individuals, not as functions or roles. This will likely require an investment of focused time and attention. Several African cultural groups greet one another with the expression “I see you, brother . . .”
Sameness can now follow in the form of parallel perspectives, identifying those aspects that are common to both or all involved. Belonging and Loyalty is perhaps an alternative channel here where we emphasize what it is that unites us and serves our mutual and joint interests.
The military, where leadership under extreme conditions is imperative, use ‘esprit de corps’ / pride of unit in diverse and pervasive ways. Either way, or both, attachment singles out groups and individuals for special responses and dedicated effort, for at this level there is real leverage for leadership intervention.
In the impersonal domain of the working world, the next level of Significance is likely as deep as we need to go for most applications. Special relationships based on specific commitments are built at this level; such relationships are rare but necessary for real endurance and full engagement. The Gallup organization has demonstrated through its extensive and diligent researches that we all need to have a ‘best friend’ at work if we are to be truly productive.
From the leader’s perspective, the two vital acts of focusing and facilitating are made possible and easier when attachment extends below the level of Senses into the realms of Sameness / Belonging and perhaps deeper to Significance. To attempt to influence the behaviours of others without such a foundation of attachment can be risky.
Attachment requires both initial and sustained interest and effort to define the emerging relationship, with proper perspectives that focus on similarities rather than differences and also the acceptance of significant attributes and contributions that become the basis for unique relationships.
The conclusions . . .
Effective leaders are real people. They are not ‘appointees’, roles, functions, or in any other way imposed. Real people have real relationships based on personal attachment which has been initiated and earned.
While attachments can and do develop on their own, without deliberate interventions, they can also be fostered and strengthened by particular and mindful effort. The wise leader looks at the foundations of relationships before extending them or using them to create needed change; leverage is often precarious and there’s sometimes more to be lost than just the immediate intention – relationships have to be founded on firm attachments and be sustainable, adaptive and resilient.
Investing time and energy in strengthening attachments and building relationships is sound strategy; it’s also ‘money-in-the-bank’ against possible future demands in difficult circumstances.
Think about it, please.
I'd welcome your questions, comments and suggestions. We can all learn through dialogue and your experiences will undoubtedly gain more value when shared. Please contact me at david@andros.org.
A Note to our Readers . . .
Previous series of articles on the topics of
- Tomorrow’s Leaders – a model for SME organizations
- The Leadership Crucible – the ‘making’ of leaders
- Leadership Characteristics – a comprehensive catalogue of leader qualities
- Succession Planning – the strategic argument, principles and strategies, and
- Managing Change – every person’s guide to painless processes
have been summarized as discussion guides for those who lead and manage through mentoring and coaching. If you would like to secure a copy for your own use, please contact us.
It is a pleasure to share ideas with you and we’d welcome your questions, suggestions and comments. They’ll assist us refine and expand the essential value of these initiatives. Thanks in anticipation for your participation.
|